On 2024-May-14, Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 10:42 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> > wrote: > > This had already been committed as 270af6f0df76 (the day before it was > > sent to the next commitfest). This commit wasn't included in the > > reverted set, though, so you still get deferrable PKs from > > RelationGetIndexList. I don't think this is necessarily a bad thing, > > though these don't have any usefulness as things stand (and if we deal > > with PKs by forcing not-null constraints to be underneath, then we won't > > need them either). > > So, are you saying this should be marked Committed in the commitfest?
Yeah. I've done so. -- Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "Pero la cosa no es muy grave ..." (le petit Nicolas -- René Goscinny)
