=?utf-8?Q?Dagfinn_Ilmari_Manns=C3=A5ker?= <ilm...@ilmari.org> writes:
> Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postg...@gmail.com> writes:
>> Single trailing commas are a feature that's more and more common in
>> languages, yes, but arbitrary excess commas is new to me. Could you
>> provide some examples of popular languages which have that, as I can't
>> think of any.
> The only one I can think of is Perl, which I'm not sure counts as
> popular any more. JavaScript allows consecutive commas in array
> literals, but they're not no-ops, they create empty array slots:
I'm fairly down on this idea for SQL, because I think it creates
ambiguity for the ROW() constructor syntax. That is:
(x,y) is understood to be shorthand for ROW(x,y)
(x) is not ROW(x), it's just x
(x,) means what?
I realize the original proposal intended to restrict the legality of
excess commas to only a couple of places, but to me that just flags
it as a kluge. ROW(...) ought to work pretty much the same as a
SELECT list.
As already mentioned, if you can get some variant of this through the
SQL standards process, we'll probably adopt it. But I doubt that we
want to get out front of the committee in this area.
regards, tom lane
