On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 11:53:10AM -0700, Noah Misch wrote: > On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 10:17:49AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > > Overall, this switches from one detach behavior to a different one, > > Can you say more about that? The only behavior change known to me is that a > given injection point workload uses more of INJ_MAX_CONDITION. If there's > another behavior change, it was likely unintended.
I see patch inplace030-inj-exit-race-v1.patch does not fix the race seen with repro-inj-exit-race-v1.patch. I withdraw inplace030-inj-exit-race-v1.patch, and I withdraw the above question. > To reproduce, apply [repro-inj-exit-race-v1.patch] to add > sleeps, and run: > > make -C src/test/modules/gin installcheck USE_MODULE_DB=1 & sleep 2; make -C > contrib/intarray installcheck USE_MODULE_DB=1 > > Separately, I see injection_points_attach() populates InjectionPointCondition > after InjectionPointAttach(). Shouldn't InjectionPointAttach() come last, to > avoid the same sort of race? I've not tried to reproduce that one.