Re: wrong comment in libpq.h

[Peter Eisentraut]

On 04.05.24 00:29, David Zhang wrote:
On 2024-05-03 4:53 a.m., Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
On 3 May 2024, at 13:48, Peter Eisentraut <pe...@eisentraut.org> wrote:
Maybe it's easier if we just replaced
    prototypes for functions in xxx.c

with

    declarations for xxx.c

throughout src/include/libpq/libpq.h.
+1
+1

It looks like this wording "prototypes for functions in" is used many 
times in src/include/, in many cases equally inaccurately, so I would 
suggest creating a more comprehensive patch for this.