On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 10:36 PM Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote: > > > > > > One could argue the function should also check > > > isBackgroundWorker and ignore even bgworkers that set proc->roleId, but > > > I've > > > not done that. > > > > What is the argument for ignoring such workers? > > One of the proposed code comments says, "For bgworker authors, it's convenient > to be able to recommend FORCE if a worker is blocking DROP DATABASE > unexpectedly." That argument is debatable, but I do think it applies equally > to bgworkers whether or not they set proc->roleId. >
Agreed. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
