On 26.04.24 21:24, Tom Lane wrote:
Concretely, I'm proposing the attached. Peter didn't like PG_COMMIT_HASH, so I have PG_COMMIT_REFSPEC below, but I'm not wedded to that if a better name is proposed.
This seems ok to me, but note that we do have an equivalent implementation in meson. If we don't want to update that in a similar way, maybe we should disable it.
