On Sunday, April 28, 2024, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 06:45:30PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote: > > My preference would be to limit this section to a single example. The > > numeric one, as it provides values for more output columns. I would > change > > the output format to expanded from default, in order to show all columns > > and not overrun the length of a single line. > > Agreed that having two examples does not bring much, so this could be > brought to a single one. The first one is enough to show the point of > the function, IMO. It is shorter in width and it shows all the output > columns. > > Agreed. The column names are self-explanatory if you’ve seen errors before. The values are immaterial. Plus we don’t generally use psql-specific features in our examples. David J.
