On 2024-04-26 14:39:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > > I don't think enabling backtraces without a way to disable them is a good > > idea > > - security vulnerablilities in backtrace generation code are far from > > unheard > > of and can make error handling a lot slower... > > Well, in that case we have to have some kind of control GUC, and > I think the consensus is that the one we have now is under-designed. > So I also vote for a full revert and try again in v18.
Yea, makes sense. I just wanted to point out that some level of control is needed, not say that what we have now is right.
