Hi, thank you for your work with this subject.
While I was reviewing your code, I noticed that your patch conflicts
with another patch [0] that been committed.
[0]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA%2BhUKGJkOiOCa%2Bmag4BF%2BzHo7qo%3Do9CFheB8%3Dg6uT5TUm2gkvA%40mail.gmail.com
On 28.03.2024 13:12, Anthonin Bonnefoy wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the review.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 4:07 AM Masahiko Sawada
<sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
As for the proposed patch, the following part should handle the
temp tables too:
True, I've missed the local blocks. I've updated the patch:
- read_rate and write_rate now include local block usage
- I've added a specific output for reporting local blocks instead of
combining them in the same output.
Regards,
Anthonin
--
Regards,
Alena Rybakina
Postgres Professional:http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
