On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 at 15:16, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 02:04:22PM +1200, David Rowley wrote: > > It makes sense to talk about the hashing variations closer to the > > object identifier part. > > Mostly what I had in mind. A separate <para> for the new part you are > adding at the end of the first part feels a bit more natural split > here. Feel free to discard my comment if you think that's not worth > it.
Thanks for the review. I've now pushed this, backpatching to 12. David
