Hi, On 2024-04-18 09:07:43 -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote: > On 18/04/2024 00:39, Andres Freund wrote: > >There are lots of places that could benefit from adding 'static > >const'. > > I found a few more places.
Good catches. > Patch 004 > > The opposite would also help, adding static. > In these places, I believe it is safe to add static, > allowing the compiler to transform into read-only, definitively. I don't think this would even compile? E.g. LockTagTypeNames, pg_wchar_table are declared in a header and used across translation units. Greetings, Andres Freund
