On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 03:05:32PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > > I think we should work on generating a lot of func.sgml. Particularly the > > signature etc should just come from pg_proc.dat, it's pointlessly painful to > > generate that by hand. And for a lot of the functions we should probably > > move > > the existing func.sgml comments to the description in pg_proc.dat. > > Where are you going to get the examples and text descriptions from? > (And no, I don't agree that the pg_description string should match > what's in the docs. The description string has to be a short > one-liner in just about every case.) > > This sounds to me like it would be a painful exercise with not a > lot of benefit in the end.
Maybe we could _verify_ the contents of func.sgml against pg_proc. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Only you can decide what is important to you.
