> On 7 Apr 2024, at 18:51, Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> wrote: >> On 7 Apr 2024, at 18:28, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> I'm ok with printing path + some content or just the path. > > I think printing the last 512 bytes or so would be a good approach, I'll take > care of it later tonight. That would be a backpatchable change IMHO. In the end I opted for just printing the path to avoid introducing logic (at this point in the cycle) for ensuring that a negative offset doesn't exceed the filesize. Since it changes behavior I haven't backpatched it, but can do that if we think it's more of a fix than a change (I think it can be argued either way, I have no strong feelings). -- Daniel Gustafsson
