On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 8:35 PM Amit Langote <amitlangot...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 9:02 PM Amit Langote <amitlangot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'll post the rebased 0002 tomorrow after addressing your comments.
>
> Here's one. Main changes:
>
> * Fixed a bug in get_table_json_columns() which caused nested columns
> to be deparsed incorrectly, something Jian reported upthread.
> * Simplified the algorithm in JsonTablePlanNextRow()
>
> I'll post another revision or two maybe tomorrow, but posting what I
> have now in case Jian wants to do more testing.
>
+ else
+ {
+ /*
+ * Parent and thus the plan has no more rows.
+ */
+ return false;
+ }
in JsonTablePlanNextRow, the above comment seems strange to me.
+ /*
+ * Re-evaluate a nested plan's row pattern using the new parent row
+ * pattern, if present.
+ */
+ Assert(parent != NULL);
+ if (!parent->current.isnull)
+ JsonTableResetRowPattern(planstate, parent->current.value);
Is this assertion useful?
if parent is null, then parent->current.isnull will cause segmentation fault.
I tested with 3 NESTED PATH, it works! (I didn't fully understand
JsonTablePlanNextRow though).
the doc needs some polish work.
