On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 10:38 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Also, calling Photon 3 > dead because it went EOL three days ago seems over-hasty.
Well, March 1, but either way I thought "dead" for the purposes of this thread meant "you can't build the very latest version of Postgres on it", not "we've forgotten it exists". Back branches will continue to need support and testing. > Bottom line for me is that pulling 1.0.1 support now is OK, > but I think pulling 1.0.2 is premature. Okay, but IIUC, waiting for it to drop out of extended support means we deal with it for four more years. That seems excessive. --Jacob
