On Monday, April 1, 2024 7:30 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 6:26 AM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) <houzj.f...@fujitsu.com> > wrote: > > > > On Friday, March 29, 2024 2:50 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. > > > +extern XLogRecPtr pg_logical_replication_slot_advance(XLogRecPtr > moveto, > > > + bool *found_consistent_point); > > > + > > > > > > This API looks a bit awkward as the functionality doesn't match the > > > name. How about having a function with name > > > LogicalSlotAdvanceAndCheckReadynessForDecoding(moveto, > > > ready_for_decoding) with the same functionality as your patch has > > > for > > > pg_logical_replication_slot_advance() and then invoke it both from > > > pg_logical_replication_slot_advance and slotsync.c. The function > > > name is too big, we can think of a shorter name. Any ideas? > > > > How about LogicalSlotAdvanceAndCheckDecodingState() Or just > > LogicalSlotAdvanceAndCheckDecoding()? > > > > It is about snapbuild state, so how about naming the function as > LogicalSlotAdvanceAndCheckSnapState()?
It looks better to me, so changed. > > I have made quite a few cosmetic changes in comments and code. See > attached. This is atop your latest patch. Can you please review and include > these changes in the next version? Thanks, I have reviewed and merged them. Attach the V5 patch set which addressed above comments and ran pgindent. I will think and test the improvement suggested by Bertrand[1] and reply after that. [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/Zgp8n9QD5nYSESnM%40ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal Best Regards, Hou zj
v5-0001-advance-the-restart_lsn-of-synced-slots-using-log.patch
Description: v5-0001-advance-the-restart_lsn-of-synced-slots-using-log.patch