Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 11:50 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Yeah, I was thinking about that too. The normal case is that you
>> don't hold any releasable resources except locks when arriving at
>> CommitSubTransaction --- if you do, it's a bug and we're going to
>> print leak warnings. Seems like maybe it'd be worth trying to
>> have a fast path for that case.
> Well, there's the abort case, too, which I think is almost equally important.
True, but in the abort case there probably *are* resources to be
cleaned up, so I'm not seeing that the fast-path idea helps.
Although maybe the idea of batching multiple cleanups would?
regards, tom lane
