On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 at 18:28, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> writes: > > Unfortunately, REL_16_STABLE does not have the additional debugging, > > so don't get to know what reltuples was set to. > > Let's wait a bit to see if it fails in HEAD ... but if not, would > it be reasonable to back-patch the additional debugging output?
I think REL_16_STABLE has told us that it's not an auto-vacuum issue. I'm uncertain what a few more failures in master will tell us aside from if reltuples == 48 is consistent or if that value is going to fluctuate. Let's give it a week and see if it fails a few more times. David
