On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 1:50 AM Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 1:30 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 04:49:12PM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 12:25:37PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > > >> In the same vein, I think deactivated_at or inactive_since might be > > >> good names to consider. I think they get at the same thing as > > >> released_time, but they avoid introducing a completely new word > > >> (release, as opposed to active/inactive). > > > > > > Yeah, I'd vote for inactive_since then. > > > > Having only skimmed some of the related discussions, I'm inclined to agree > > that inactive_since provides the clearest description for the column. > > I think we all have some agreement on inactive_since. So, I'm > attaching the patch for that change.
pg_proc.dat needs to be changed to refer to 'inactive_since' instead of 'last_inactive_time' in the attached patch. thanks Shveta
