On 21.03.24 10:51, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
At this point, I'm not too stressed about pressing forward with these last two patches. We can look at them again perhaps if we make progress on a more compact node output format. When I started this thread, I had a lot of questions about various details about the RangeTblEntry struct, and we have achieved many answers during the discussions, so I'm happy with the progress. So for PG17, I'd like to just do patches 0001..0005.Patches 1 thru 5 look good to me
Thanks for checking. I have committed these (1 through 5) and will close the commit fest entry.
