Hi, > I took a closer look at this patch over the last couple days, and I did > a bunch of benchmarks to see how expensive the accounting is. The good > news is that I haven't observed any overhead - I did two simple tests, > that I think would be particularly sensitive to this: > > [...]
Just wanted to let you know that v20231226 doesn't apply. The patch needs love from somebody interested in it. Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev (wearing a co-CFM hat)
