At Wed, 6 Mar 2024 11:34:29 +0100, Alexander Kukushkin <cyberd...@gmail.com> wrote in > Hmm, I think you meant to use wal_segment_size, because 0x100000 is just > 1MB. As a result, currently it works for you by accident.
Oh, I once saw the fix work, but seems not to be working after some point. The new issue was a corruption of received WAL records on the first standby, and it may be related to the setting. > > Thus, I managed to reproduce precisely the same situation as you > > described utilizing your script with modifications and some core > > tweaks, and with the change above, I saw that the behavior was > > fixed. However, for reasons unclear to me, it shows another issue, and > > I am running out of time and need more caffeine. I'll continue > > investigating this tomorrow. > > > > Thank you for spending your time on it! You're welcome, but I aplogize for the delay in the work.. regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
