David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> 于2024年3月11日周一 13:25写道：
> On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 at 22:50, David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 at 15:24, Tender Wang <tndrw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Andrei Lepikhov <a.lepik...@postgrespro.ru> 于2024年3月6日周三 11:37写道： > > >> I think, it is a bug. Should it be fixed (and back-patched) earlier? > > > > > > Agreed. Need David to review it as he knows this area best. > > > > This is on my list of things to do. Just not at the top yet. > > I've gone over this patch and I'm happy with the changes to > nodeMemoize.c. The thing I did change was the newly added test. The > problem there was the test was passing for me with and without the > code fix. I ended up changing the test so the cache hits and misses > are reported. That required moving the test to above where the > work_mem is set to 64KB so we can be certain the values will all be > cached and the cache hits are predictable. > > My other changes were just cosmetic. > > Thanks for working on this fix. I've pushed the patch. > > David > Thanks for pushing the patch. -- Tender Wang OpenPie: https://en.openpie.com/
