On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 10:59, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > > On 2024-Mar-08, Bharath Rupireddy wrote: > > > This works only if '* 'is specified as the only one character in > > backtrace_functions = '*', right? If yes, what if someone sets > > backtrace_functions = 'foo, bar, *, baz'? > > It throws an error, as expected. This is a useless waste of resources: > checking for "foo" and "bar" is pointless, since the * is going to give > a positive match anyway. And the "baz" is a waste of memory which is > never going to be checked.
Makes sense. Attached is a new patchset that implements it that way. I've not included Bharath his 0003 patch, since it's a much bigger change than the others, and thus might need some more discussion.
v5-0002-Add-wildcard-support-to-backtrace_functions-GUC.patch
Description: Binary data
v5-0001-Add-backtrace_functions_min_level.patch
Description: Binary data
