On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 09:51:40AM +0530, Robert Haas wrote: > > I am not sure that it is a good idea to relax that for PG17 at this > > stage of the development cycle, though, as we have already done a lot > > in this area for pg_upgrade and it may require more tweaks during the > > beta period depending on the feedback received, so I would suggest to > > do more improvements for the 18 cycle instead once we have a cleaner > > picture of the whole. > > That's fair. > > I want to say that, unlike Tom, I'm basically in favor of preserving > OIDs in more places across updates. It seems to have little downside > and improve the understandability of the outcome. But that's separate > from whether it is a good idea to build on that infrastructure in any > particular way in the time we have left for this release.
Yes, the _minimal_ approach has changed in the past few years to make pg_upgrade debugging easier. The original design was ultra-conservative where it could be, considering how radical the core functionality was. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Only you can decide what is important to you.
