Ivan Trofimov <i.trofi...@yandex.ru> writes: > Would you be willing to review a patch that adds an `PQfnumber` overload > that takes a `field_name` size as well?
I'm a little skeptical of this idea. If you need counted strings
for PQfnumber, wouldn't you need them for every single other
string-based API in libpq as well? That's not a lift that I think
we'd want to undertake.
regards, tom lane
