On 2024-Feb-22, Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> > I propose the attached. (Extra context so that the full paragraph can > > be read from the comfort of your email program.) > > This reads awkwardly to me. I think it'd be better to construct it > so that DO NOTHING's requirement is stated exactly parallel to the other > three clause types, more or less as attached. Sure, that works. > BTW, if you read it without paying attention to markup, you'll notice > that we are saying things like > > If you specify an insert action, you must have the INSERT > privilege on the target_table_name. > > which is fairly nonsensical: we don't define privileges on the name > of something. Hmm, you're right, this is not strictly correct. > While I've not done anything about that here, I wonder if we shouldn't > just write "privilege on the target table" without any special markup. That would work for me. -- Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
