On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 10:25:00AM -0800, Jeff Davis wrote: > To be clear: > > x = pg_atomic_[read|write]_membarrier_u64(&v); > > is semantically equivalent to: > > pg_memory_barrier(); > x = pg_atomic_[read|write]_u64(&v); > pg_memory_barrier(); > > ? > > If so, that does seem more convenient.
I think that's about right. The upthread feedback from Andres [0] provides some additional context. [0] https://postgr.es/m/20231110231150.fjm77gup2i7xu6hc%40alap3.anarazel.de -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
