On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 6:19 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 12:33 PM shveta malik <shveta.ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you for the explanation. It makes sense to me to move the check.
>
>
> 2. If the wal_level is not logical, the server will need to restart
> anyway to change the wal_level and have the slotsync worker work. Does
> it make sense to have the postmaster exit if the wal_level is not
> logical and sync_replication_slots is enabled? For instance, we have
> similar checks in PostmsaterMain():
>
> if (summarize_wal && wal_level == WAL_LEVEL_MINIMAL)
> ereport(ERROR,
> (errmsg("WAL cannot be summarized when wal_level is
> \"minimal\"")));
Thanks for the feedback. I have addressed it in v93.
thanks
SHveta
