On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 23:52, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postg...@gmail.com> wrote: > What I meant was that > > > (char *) block + Bump_BLOCKHDRSZ > vs > > ((char *) block) + Bump_BLOCKHDRSZ > > , when combined with my little experience with pointer addition and > precedence, and a lack of compiler at the ready at that point in time, > I was afraid that "(char *) block + Bump_BLOCKHDRSZ" would be parsed > as "(char *) (block + Bump_BLOCKHDRSZ)", which would get different > offsets across the two statements. > Godbolt has since helped me understand that both are equivalent.
I failed to notice this. I've made them the same regardless to prevent future questions from being raised about the discrepancy between the two. David
