On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:18:44PM +0200, Petr Jelinek wrote: > On 20/06/18 09:59, Arseny Sher wrote: >> Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes: >>> It seems to me that we still want to have the slot forwarding finish in >>> this case even if this is interrupted. Petr, isn't that the intention >>> here? > > Well, it seems wasteful to just exit there if we already finished all > the requested work, also gives some consistency with the coding of > get/peek_changes. Not very important for the functionality either way.
I like the concept of consistency. Could it be possible to get a patch from all the feedback and exchange gathered here? Petr, I think that it would not hurt if you use the set of words and comments you think is most adapted as the primary author of the feature. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
