>> I have found it very strange that a tool like doxygen which can create >> all sorts of call graphs, just ignores some comments. The comments >> above function are very important.
I agree with you . I hated doxygen for decades because of the irritating annotations it required. When I discovered IDEs were creating doxygen-like popups from conventional comments, I tried to figure out what they were doing. In the process, I discovered filters, and I created a filter to match what I thought the IDEs were doing. (As it turns out, IDEs implement their own rendering independent of doxygen.) I find it ironic I’ve gone from being a long-time hater of doxygen to being its advocate. * John Morris Tiny tidbit of history. Back in the 70’s, I created a comment extractor for the language Ratfor. We used it to maintain an alphabetical index of functions and to display pseudo-code. We drew our call graphs by hand and saved them in manila folders. Hard to imagine now.
