On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 6:13 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 2:54 AM, Teodor Sigaev <teo...@sigaev.ru> wrote: >>> We just had a customer hit this issue. I kind of wonder whether this >>> shouldn't be backpatched: Currently the execution on the primary is >>> O(NBuffers * log(ndrels)) whereas it's O(NBuffers * ndrels) on the >>> standby - with a lot higher constants to boot. That means it's very >>> easy to get into situations where the standy starts to lag behind very >>> significantly. >> >> +1, we faced with that too > > +1 to back-patch. As Horiguchi-san pointed out, this is basically > the fix for oversight of commit 279628a0a7, not new feature.
+1 -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com
