On Jan 25, 2024, at 11:03, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I changed the preceding para to say "... check expressions are > required in ...", which I thought was sufficient to cover that. > Also, the tabular description of the operator tells you not to do it.
Yeah, that’s good. I was perhaps leaning into being over-explicit after it took me a while to even figure out that there was a difference, let alone where matters. >> What do you think of also dropping the article from all the references to >> “the strict mode” or “the lax mode”, to make them “strict mode” and “lax >> mode”, respectively? > > Certainly most of 'em don't need it. I'll make it so. Nice, thanks! David
