On 1/25/24 17:42, Tom Lane wrote:
David Steele <da...@pgmasters.net> writes:
Another thing to note here -- knowing the LSN is important but also
knowing that backup recovery was attempted (i.e. backup_label exists) is
really crucial. Knowing both just saves so much time in back and forth
debugging.
It appears the tally for back patching is:
For: Andres, David, Michael B
Not Sure: Robert, Laurenz, Michael P
It seems at least nobody is dead set against it.
We're talking about 1d35f705e, right? That certainly looks harmless
and potentially useful. I'm +1 for back-patching.
That's the one. If we were modifying existing messages I would be
against it, but new, infrequent (but oh so helpful) messages seem fine.
Regards,
-David
