Hi,

On 2024-01-10 14:35:52 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Here's a patch that gets rid of AuxProcType. It's independent of the other
> patches in this thread; if this is committed, I'll rebase the rest of the
> patches over this and get rid of the new PMC_* enum.
> 
> Three patches, actually. The first one fixes an existing comment that I
> noticed to be incorrect while working on this. I'll push that soon, barring
> objections. The second one gets rid of AuxProcType, and the third one
> replaces IsBackgroundWorker, IsAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() and
> IsAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() with checks on MyBackendType. So MyBackendType
> is now the primary way to check what kind of a process the current process
> is.
> 
> 'am_walsender' would also be fairly straightforward to remove and replace
> with AmWalSenderProcess(). I didn't do that because we also have
> am_db_walsender and am_cascading_walsender which cannot be directly replaced
> with MyBackendType. Given that, it might be best to keep am_walsender for
> symmetry.


> @@ -561,13 +561,13 @@ static void ShmemBackendArrayAdd(Backend *bn);
>  static void ShmemBackendArrayRemove(Backend *bn);
>  #endif                                                       /* EXEC_BACKEND 
> */
>  
> -#define StartupDataBase()            StartChildProcess(StartupProcess)
> -#define StartArchiver()                      
> StartChildProcess(ArchiverProcess)
> -#define StartBackgroundWriter() StartChildProcess(BgWriterProcess)
> -#define StartCheckpointer()          StartChildProcess(CheckpointerProcess)
> -#define StartWalWriter()             StartChildProcess(WalWriterProcess)
> -#define StartWalReceiver()           StartChildProcess(WalReceiverProcess)
> -#define StartWalSummarizer() StartChildProcess(WalSummarizerProcess)
> +#define StartupDataBase()            StartChildProcess(B_STARTUP)
> +#define StartArchiver()                      StartChildProcess(B_ARCHIVER)
> +#define StartBackgroundWriter() StartChildProcess(B_BG_WRITER)
> +#define StartCheckpointer()          StartChildProcess(B_CHECKPOINTER)
> +#define StartWalWriter()             StartChildProcess(B_WAL_WRITER)
> +#define StartWalReceiver()           StartChildProcess(B_WAL_RECEIVER)
> +#define StartWalSummarizer() StartChildProcess(B_WAL_SUMMARIZER)

Not for this commit, but we ought to rip out these macros - all they do is to
make it harder to understand the code.




> @@ -5344,31 +5344,31 @@ StartChildProcess(AuxProcType type)
>               errno = save_errno;
>               switch (type)
>               {
> -                     case StartupProcess:
> +                     case B_STARTUP:
>                               ereport(LOG,
>                                               (errmsg("could not fork startup 
> process: %m")));
>                               break;
> -                     case ArchiverProcess:
> +                     case B_ARCHIVER:
>                               ereport(LOG,
>                                               (errmsg("could not fork 
> archiver process: %m")));
>                               break;
> -                     case BgWriterProcess:
> +                     case B_BG_WRITER:
>                               ereport(LOG,
>                                               (errmsg("could not fork 
> background writer process: %m")));
>                               break;
> -                     case CheckpointerProcess:
> +                     case B_CHECKPOINTER:
>                               ereport(LOG,
>                                               (errmsg("could not fork 
> checkpointer process: %m")));
>                               break;
> -                     case WalWriterProcess:
> +                     case B_WAL_WRITER:
>                               ereport(LOG,
>                                               (errmsg("could not fork WAL 
> writer process: %m")));
>                               break;
> -                     case WalReceiverProcess:
> +                     case B_WAL_RECEIVER:
>                               ereport(LOG,
>                                               (errmsg("could not fork WAL 
> receiver process: %m")));
>                               break;
> -                     case WalSummarizerProcess:
> +                     case B_WAL_SUMMARIZER:
>                               ereport(LOG,
>                                               (errmsg("could not fork WAL 
> summarizer process: %m")));
>                               break;

Seems we should replace this with something slightly more generic one of these
days...


> diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/backend_status.c 
> b/src/backend/utils/activity/backend_status.c
> index 1a1050c8da1..92f24db4e18 100644
> --- a/src/backend/utils/activity/backend_status.c
> +++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/backend_status.c
> @@ -257,17 +257,16 @@ pgstat_beinit(void)
>       else
>       {
>               /* Must be an auxiliary process */
> -             Assert(MyAuxProcType != NotAnAuxProcess);
> +             Assert(IsAuxProcess(MyBackendType));
>  
>               /*
>                * Assign the MyBEEntry for an auxiliary process.  Since it 
> doesn't
>                * have a BackendId, the slot is statically allocated based on 
> the
> -              * auxiliary process type (MyAuxProcType).  Backends use slots 
> indexed
> -              * in the range from 0 to MaxBackends (exclusive), so we use
> -              * MaxBackends + AuxProcType as the index of the slot for an 
> auxiliary
> -              * process.
> +              * auxiliary process type.  Backends use slots indexed in the 
> range
> +              * from 0 to MaxBackends (exclusive), and aux processes use the 
> slots
> +              * after that.
>                */
> -             MyBEEntry = &BackendStatusArray[MaxBackends + MyAuxProcType];
> +             MyBEEntry = &BackendStatusArray[MaxBackends + MyBackendType - 
> FIRST_AUX_PROC];
>       }

Hm, this seems less than pretty. It's probably ok for now, but it seems like a
better fix might be to just start assigning backend ids to aux procs or switch
to indexing by pgprocno?


> From 795929a5f5a5d6ea4fa8a46bb15c68d2ff46ad3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@iki.fi>
> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 12:59:48 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH v6 3/3] Use MyBackendType in more places to check what process
>  this is
> 
> Remove IsBackgroundWorker, IsAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() and
> IsAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() in favor of new Am*Process() macros that
> use MyBackendType. For consistency with the existing Am*Process()
> macros.

The Am*Process() macros aren't realy new, they are just implemented
differently, right? I guess there are a few more of them now.

Given that we are probably going to have more process types in the future, it
seems like a better direction would be a AmProcessType(proctype) style
macro/inline function. That we we don't have to mirror the list of process
types in the enum and a set of macros.

Greetings,

Andres Freund


Reply via email to