On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 at 16:29, Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo.santama...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 3:51 PM Frédéric Yhuel <frederic.yh...@dalibo.com> > wrote: >> >> On 8/17/23 14:00, Frédéric Yhuel wrote: >> > On 8/17/23 09:32, Frédéric Yhuel wrote: >> >> On 8/10/23 17:06, Juan José Santamaría Flecha wrote: >> >>> Recently I restored a database from a directory format backup and >> >>> having this feature would have been quite useful >> >> >> >> Thanks for resuming work on this patch. I forgot to mention this in my >> >> original email, but the motivation was also to speed up the restore >> >> process. Parallelizing the FK checks could make a huge difference in >> >> certain cases. We should probably provide such a test case (with perf >> >> numbers), and maybe this is it what Robert asked for. >> > >> > I have attached two scripts which demonstrate the following problems: > > > Thanks for the scripts, but I think Robert's concerns come from the safety, > and not the performance, of the parallel operation. > > Proving its vulnerability could be easy with a counter example, but assuring > its safety is trickier. What test would suffice to do that?
I'm seeing that there has been no activity in this thread for more than 5 months, I'm planning to close this in the current commitfest unless someone is planning to take it forward. It can be opened again when there is more interest. Regards, Vignesh
