čt 18. 1. 2024 v 8:59 odesílatel Alexander Korotkov <aekorot...@gmail.com>
napsal:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 4:16 AM torikoshia <torikos...@oss.nttdata.com>
> wrote:
> > On 2024-01-18 10:10, jian he wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 8:57 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 6:38 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > >> > Kyotaro-san's suggestion isn't bad, though I might shorten it to
> > >> > error_action {error|ignore|log} (or perhaps "stop" instead of
> "error")?
> > >> > You will need a separate parameter anyway to specify the destination
> > >> > of "log", unless "none" became an illegal table name when I wasn't
> > >> > looking. I don't buy that one parameter that has some special
> values
> > >> > while other values could be names will be a good design. Moreover,
> > >> > what if we want to support (say) log-to-file along with
> log-to-table?
> > >> > Trying to distinguish a file name from a table name without any
> other
> > >> > context seems impossible.
> > >>
> > >> I've been thinking we can add more values to this option to log errors
> > >> not only to the server logs but also to the error table (not sure
> > >> details but I imagined an error table is created for each table on
> > >> error), without an additional option for the destination name. The
> > >> values would be like error_action {error|ignore|save-logs|save-table}.
> > >>
> > >
> > > another idea:
> > > on_error {error|ignore|other_future_option}
> > > if not specified then by default ERROR.
> > > You can also specify ERROR or IGNORE for now.
> > >
> > > I agree, the parameter "error_action" is better than "location".
> >
> > I'm not sure whether error_action or on_error is better, but either way
> > "error_action error" and "on_error error" seems a bit odd to me.
> > I feel "stop" is better for both cases as Tom suggested.
>
> OK. What about this?
> on_error {stop|ignore|other_future_option}
> where other_future_option might be compound like "file 'copy.log'" or
> "table 'copy_log'".
>
+1
it is consistent with psql
Regards
Pavel
>
> ------
> Regards,
> Alexander Korotkov
>
>
>
