On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 5:01 PM Richard Guo <guofengli...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 2:30 AM Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 3:32 AM Richard Guo <guofengli...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>
> > Fair point.  I think we can back-patch a more minimal fix, as Tom
>> > proposed in [1], which disallows the reparameterization if the path
>> > contains sampling info that references the outer rel.  But I think we
>> > need also to disallow the reparameterization of a path if it contains
>> > restriction clauses that reference the outer rel, as such paths have
>> > been found to cause incorrect results, or planning errors as in [2].
>>
>> Do you want to produce a patch for that, to go along with this patch for
>> master?
>
>
> Sure, here it is:
> v10-0001-Avoid-reparameterizing-Paths-when-it-s-not-suitable.patch
>

I forgot to mention that this patch applies on v16 not master.

Thanks
Richard

Reply via email to