Great! That's what exactly we need. The patch LGTM, +1
Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> 于2024年1月13日周六 04:47写道： > I wrote: > > This is uncomfortably much in bed with the tuple table slot code, > > perhaps, but I don't see a way to do it more cleanly unless we want > > to add some new provisions to that API. Andres, do you have any > > thoughts about that? > > Oh! After nosing around a bit more I remembered systable_recheck_tuple, > which is meant for exactly this purpose. So v4 attached. > > regards, tom lane > >
