Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 03:06:26PM -0800, Jeff Davis wrote:
>> It makes me wonder if we should use the resowner mechanism to track
>> pointers to malloc'd memory. Then we could use a standard pattern for
>> these kinds of cases, and it would also catch more remote issues, like
>> if a pstrdup() fails in an error path (which can happen a few lines up
>> if the parse fails).
> That seems worth exploring.
I'm pretty dubious about adding overhead for that, mainly because
most of the direct callers of malloc in a backend are going to be
code that's not under our control. Modifying the callers that we
do control is not going to give a full solution, and could well be
outright misleading.
> Another option could be to surround this with PG_TRY/PG_FINALLY, but your
> patch seems sufficient, too.
Yeah, seems fine for now. If that function grows any more complexity
then we could think about using PG_TRY.
regards, tom lane
