pá 12. 1. 2024 v 14:53 odesílatel Michael Banck <mba...@gmx.net> napsal:
> Hi, > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 01:35:24PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > pá 12. 1. 2024 v 11:54 odesílatel Michael Banck <mba...@gmx.net> napsal: > > > Which version of Postgres is this and on which platform/distribution? > > > > It was tested on master branch (pg 17) on Fedora 39 > > > > > Did you try keep jit on but set jit_inline_above_cost to 0? > > > > > > The back-branches have a fix for the above case, i.e. llvmjit memleaks > > > that can be worked-around by setting jit_inline_above_cost=0. > > I got that wrong, it needs to be -1 to disable it. > > But if you are already running the master branch, it is probably a > separate issue. > I tested code CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION public.fx(iter integer) RETURNS void LANGUAGE plpgsql AS $function$ declare c cursor(m bigint) for select distinct i from generate_series(1, m) g(i); t bigint; s bigint; begin for i in 1..iter loop s := 0; for r in c(i*10000) loop s := s + r.i; end loop; raise notice '%=%', i, s; end loop; end; $function$ default master branch - res 190MB ram jit_inline_above_cost = -1 doesn't helps disabling JIT doesn't helps too, so it looks like the wrong hypothesis , and the problem is maybe somewhere else :-/ Regards Pavel > > > Michael >