pá 12. 1. 2024 v 14:53 odesílatel Michael Banck <mba...@gmx.net> napsal:

> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 01:35:24PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > pá 12. 1. 2024 v 11:54 odesílatel Michael Banck <mba...@gmx.net> napsal:
> > > Which version of Postgres is this and on which platform/distribution?
> >
> > It was tested on master branch (pg 17) on Fedora 39
> >
> > > Did you try keep jit on but set jit_inline_above_cost to 0?
> > >
> > > The back-branches have a fix for the above case, i.e. llvmjit memleaks
> > > that can be worked-around by setting jit_inline_above_cost=0.
>
> I got that wrong, it needs to be -1 to disable it.
>
> But if you are already running the master branch, it is probably a
> separate issue.
>

I tested code

CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION public.fx(iter integer)
 RETURNS void
 LANGUAGE plpgsql
AS $function$
declare
  c cursor(m bigint) for select distinct i from generate_series(1, m) g(i);
  t bigint;
  s bigint;
begin
  for i in 1..iter
  loop
    s := 0;
    for r in c(i*10000)
    loop
      s := s + r.i;
    end loop;
    raise notice '%=%', i, s;
  end loop;
end;
$function$

default master branch - res 190MB ram
jit_inline_above_cost = -1 doesn't helps
disabling JIT doesn't helps too,

so it looks like the wrong hypothesis , and the problem is maybe somewhere
else :-/

Regards

Pavel



>
>
> Michael
>

Reply via email to