Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 10:28:50PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> Yeah, I thought about that too after sending my message. This version >> LGTM, although maybe the comment could be slightly more verbose with >> explicit reference to Inf/NaN as being the cases we need to quote.
> Done.
This version works for me.
regards, tom lane
