On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 09:55:58AM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote: > Oh, wow. Nice detective work! Thank you for figuring that out.
+1 > Now we have the question of whether to go forwards (commit the "socket > table" thing), or backwards (revert 04a09ee for now to clear the CI > failures). I don't love the hidden complexity of the socket table and > am not in a hurry to commit it, but I don't currently see another > way... on the other hand we have other CI flapping due to that problem > too so reverting 04a09ee would be sweeping problems under the carpet. > I still need to process your feedback/discoveries on that other thread > and it may take a few weeks for me to get to it. I don't think we need to revert 04a09ee provided the issue is unrelated and a fix is in development. -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
