> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 9:03 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Why should we regard that as anything other than a bug in the > ProcessUtility hook? A failed transaction should not send any > notifies.
Fair point. That was also my initial assumption but I thought that the transaction state was not available from a hook as I've missed IsAbortedTransactionBlockState. I will rely on IsAbortedTransactionBlockState to avoid this case, thanks for the input. Regards, Anthonin.
