On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 05:55:06PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 12:52:23PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote: > >> What's the point of randomly reviving threads from 6 years ago, without any > >> further analysis? > > > Well, I feel like this is an imporant change, and got dropped because it > > was determined to not be a new change in Postgres 10. Still I think it > > should be addressed and am looking to see if others feel the same. > > You're expecting people to re-research something that dropped off the > radar years ago, probably because it wasn't sufficiently interesting > at the time. If the point hasn't been raised again since then, > I'd guess it's not any more interesting now. Most of us have better > things to do than go re-read old threads --- and dredging them up > ten at a time is not improving the odds that people will care to look.
I can do the work. I was more looking for any feedback that this is a valid area to work on. I will do some work on this and publish an updated patch because I think using the right terms makes sense. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Only you can decide what is important to you.
