Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> writes:
>> On 22 Nov 2023, at 14:30, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksan...@timescale.com>
>> wrote:
>> It sort of makes sense. I wonder though if we should limit the maximum
>> number of iterations instead. If somebody specified 1_000_000+
>> iteration this could also indicate a user error.
> I don't think it would be useful to limit this at an arbitrary point,
> iteration
> count can be set per password and if someone want a specific password to be
> super-hard to brute force then why should we limit that?
Maybe because it could be used to construct a DOS scenario? In
particular, since CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS doesn't work on the frontend
side, a situation like this wouldn't be interruptible there.
I agree with Aleksander that such cases are much more likely to
indicate user error than anything else.
regards, tom lane
