On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 at 15:44, Christian Ullrich <ch...@chrullrich.net> wrote: > > I did wonder about "NO CHECK" but wasn't sure if having two words > > would make the parser change more complex. > > DEFERRED?
That's a good shout. I wouldn't mind either of those choices. So can I assume at least that no-one has an objection to the general principle? I don't currently have a PG dev environment set up so it's non-trivial for me to implement, which I'm ok with but not if I'm just wasting my (and everyone else's) time :) Cheers Geoff
