On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 11:21 PM Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> wrote: > After adding the search path cache (recent commit f26c2368dc) hopefully > that helps to make the above suggestion more reasonable performance- > wise. I think we can call that progress.
I agree. Not to burden you, but do you know what the overhead is now, and do you have any plans to further reduce it? I don't believe that's the only thing we ought to be doing here, necessarily, but it is one thing that we definitely should be doing and probably the least controversial. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
