Peter Eisentraut <pe...@eisentraut.org> writes:
> On 14.11.23 17:15, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I don't love the patch details though. It seems entirely wrong to check
>> this before we check the opclass match.
> Not sure why? The order doesn't seem to matter?
The case that was bothering me was if we had a non-collated type
versus a collated type. That would result in throwing an error
about collation mismatch, when complaining about the opclass seems
more apropos. However, if we do this:
> I see. That means we shouldn't raise an error on a mismatch but just do
> if (key->partcollation[i] != collationIds[j])
> continue;
it might not matter much.
regards, tom lane
